<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Book Reviews on Eiken</title><link>https://eiken59.github.io/book_reviews/</link><description>Recent content in Book Reviews on Eiken</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.147.2</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://eiken59.github.io/book_reviews/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Almanack of Naval Ravikant</title><link>https://eiken59.github.io/book_reviews/j2022/</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://eiken59.github.io/book_reviews/j2022/</guid><description>&lt;p>The first thing to understand about this book is that &lt;strong>Naval did not write it&lt;/strong>. Eric Jorgenson assembled it out of tweets, podcasts, and talks, &amp;ldquo;edited for clarity and brevity (multiple times),&amp;rdquo; and the disclaimer up front quietly asks you to &amp;ldquo;verify phrasing with a primary source&amp;rdquo; and to &amp;ldquo;interpret generously.&amp;rdquo; So before judging any of the ideas, you have to notice the form: this is a collection of maxims optimized for the screenshot. That is not incidental. It shapes everything that follows.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>The Courage to be Disliked</title><link>https://eiken59.github.io/book_reviews/kk2016/</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://eiken59.github.io/book_reviews/kk2016/</guid><description>&lt;p>When I first read &lt;em>The Courage to Be Disliked&lt;/em>, the philosopher&amp;rsquo;s bold, absolute claims set off all my mental alarms about logic and statistics. Statements like &amp;ldquo;the world is simple,&amp;rdquo; &amp;ldquo;you choose your own misfortune,&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;all problems are relationship problems&amp;rdquo; seemed at first glance like blind optimism. They felt like an elitist trick that ignored physical reality and objective odds. However, once I stripped away the emotional and moral language and tested my doubts against the book&amp;rsquo;s core logic, I realized this isn&amp;rsquo;t just a comforting self-help book. Instead, it’s a coldly rational system that demands absolute responsibility for your own decisions.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Thinking, Fast and Slow</title><link>https://eiken59.github.io/book_reviews/k2012/</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://eiken59.github.io/book_reviews/k2012/</guid><description>&lt;p>In economics, people are usually assumed to be rational agents making consistent and logical choices. However, Kahneman dismantled this assumption by exposing the physical realities of our cognitive hardware. To me, &lt;em>Thinking, Fast and Slow&lt;/em> reads less like a traditional psychology book and more like a brutally honest system specifications manual for the human brain.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Our brain is a machine with limited computing power, strictly constrained by evolutionary hardware, historical biases, and inherent &amp;ldquo;bugs.&amp;rdquo; Kahneman uses System 1 and System 2 to explain our processing architecture. For example, when you meet someone and instantly feel that their &amp;ldquo;vibe is off,&amp;rdquo; it might seem like an irrational prejudice. However, Kahneman explains this biologically: our amygdala performs rapid feature hashing and pattern recognition, wiring us to sense potential threats in a microsecond based on past data. Knowing this, we shouldn&amp;rsquo;t waste cognitive bandwidth feeling guilty about these initial biases. They are purely physical, cause-and-effect mechanisms. Instead, true rationality is utilizing your logical processor (System 2) to override or verify if the alarm raised by the intuitive brain (System 1) is actually a valid threat before weaponizing it into a permanent judgment.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>